Can you wobble your way to buns of steel?

The popularity of “toning” shoes, which have unstable soles that require you to work muscles harder to stay balanced, suggests consumers are banking on it.

Sales of toning shoes — which cost from $70 to upwards of $200 and have enlisted celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and Wayne Gretzky to tout their fitness benefits — soared to $736 million in 2010 from $145 million the year before thanks to the entry of more than a dozen brands into the market, according to market research firm NPD Group.

The ads for many of the shoes, showcasing women with enviably sculpted legs, say that wearing them will help you burn more calories, tone muscles and improve posture. (There are toning shoes for men, too, but the customer base is overwhelmingly female.)

Most manufacturers compare the experience of wearing their shoes to walking on sand.

Foot doctors for years have been prescribing shoes with unstable soles to help patients with foot or ankle arthritis, but can they also get you a few steps closer to firmer thighs?

Peer-reviewed studies on shoes made by Masai Barefoot Technology, pioneers of the rocker-bottom shoes that are beveled at the heel and toe, have found that standing and walking in unstable shoes can strengthen neglected foot muscles and provide some knee and low back pain relief, along with other therapeutic benefits.

Studies on FitFlops, which use Microwobbleboard technology in the midsole, have found they reduce foot pressure by an average of 25 percent and can absorb 22 percent more shock in the lower legs.

Whether that translates to a better backside is sketchy.

Skechers, whose Shape-ups have a rocker sole and an “ultra-soft Resamax kinetic wedge” for a squishier cushion, points to a study published last year in the journal Clinical Biomechanics that found that people who walked in MBTs after ankle arthritis surgery burned more calories than controls who walked barefoot or in normal walking shoes.

Previous news stories have cited studies funded by Skechers that found people lost more weight and body fat wearing Shape-ups than flat shoes, but those studies were criticized as being poorly controlled (Skechers declined to provide the studies).

Reebok, whose EasyTones use balance-ball-inspired pods and “Moving Air Technology” to create instability, commissioned a study that found electrical activity was 28 percent greater in buttocks muscles and 11 percent greater in calf muscles for wearers of EasyTones versus a regular Reebok walking shoe.

Neither company provides guidelines for how long or frequently people should wear the shoes to see benefits. They say the shoes are not meant to replace the gym, but rather help people “get more out of every step,” said Leonard Armato, president of Skechers Fitness Group.

In search of an independent assessment, the American Council on Exercise last year sponsored a study that found that walking in Skechers Shape-ups, Reebok EasyTone Reenspire or MBTs was no more effective at burning calories or working muscles than walking in a regular New Balance running shoe.

The researchers, from the Exercise and Health Program at the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, tested muscle activity in the calves, quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus, abdominals and lower back.

Even if muscles do work harder at first to overcome the instability, the effect dissipates as muscles adjust, said Cedric Bryant, chief science officer for the American Council on Exercise.